Whistleblowers are not protected against victimisation by fellow workersThe test was whether the protected disclosure was a material reason for the employer's treatment of the workers | |||
NHS Manchester v Fecitt & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1190 | |||
Helping You About Links Contact Site Info HOME | |||
29/10/2011
The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 as inserted into Part IV A into the Employment Rights Act 1996 does not protect whistleblowing workers from the acts of fellow employees, and the employer will not be vicariously liable for these acts (although an employer's refusal to act to protect his worker would undermine the obligation to act in a manner maintaining trust and confidence and therefore justify the worker seeing the contract as undermined, resigning and claiming constructive unfair dismissal). The test in whistleblowing is whether the employer's treatment of the whistleblower is materially influenced by the protected disclosure. NHS nurses made protected disclosures about a colleague regarding false statements made about his qualifications and clinical experience. The disclosures resulted in the whistleblowers being bullied by colleagues. The situation deteriorated so much that the employer transferred the Claimants elsewhere. The Court of Appeal decided in favour of the employer's appeal, that the Claimants were not unlawfully victimised by the employer on the grounds of the protected disclosures that they had made. The CA ruled that the transfers were a lawful response to what had become a dysfunctional situation in the health centre where the nurses worked. This ruling was made despite recognising that the NHS had failed to adequately protect the nurses from the bullying they had experienced before they were transferred. The nurses asked for the Court of Appeal to interpret the legislation to protect them from victimisation by fellow workers, something the Court refused to do. It will be for a future government to decide whether to legislate an employer's vicarious liability for victimisation against whistleblowers by fellow workers |
|||
| Transcript of the judgement:- NHS Manchester v Fecitt & Ors [2011] |
|
||
| 2011 An employee sharing profits in the firm is not necessarily a partner - Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars EAT [2011] UKEAT/2011/0065_10_2705 Leaving a page out of the reasons for an EAT appeal was venial - Hine & Anor (t/a Hine Marketing Partnership) v Talbot & Ors [2011] UKEAT 1783_10_2706 In Equal Pay claims after a TUPE transfer, red circling will be accepted as constituting a genuine material factor defence - Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan & Anor (Equal Pay Act : Material factor defence and justification) [2011] UKEAT 0042_10_2505 The Minimum wage did not apply to a worker sleeping over without duties to perform - Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd (National Minimum Wage [2011] UKEAT 0102_11_1407 Requests to continue working after 65 must be considered in good faith - Compass Group Plc v Ayodele [2011] UKEAT 0484_10_1407 An autocratic style of management is no justification for breaching the contractual term of trust and confidence - McBride v Falkirk Football & Athletic Club [2011] UKEAT 0058_10_1706 Overtime payments in the absence of an agreement - Driver v Air India Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 830 Mere suspicion that a representative was acting for profit was not enough for imposing wasted costs - Jackson v Cambridgeshire County Council & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0402_09_0806 |
|||
| If you have a problem at work over harassment, disability, sex, age, race discrimination or bullying or are seeking compensation or reinstatement for unfair or constructive dismissal then contact workrep for an evaluation of your case. We can also advise you on equal pay, TUPE or employment status. Often an employee will come to us over a breach of contract by their employer or for issues concerning whistleblowing. If your employer has made you redundant you might in fact have been unfairly dismissed or wrongfully dismissed. If you have any other employment issues don't hesitate to contact WorkRep. You do not need to accept being discriminated against harassed or victimised at work. If you are suffering from bullying victimisation or discrimination at work you need to contact WorkRep early on. Whatever your employment problem is, even if you have failed in your tribunal case and there is now a costs application against you we will try to help. click for further information about problems at work |
|||
|
© 2011 Workrep | |||