Unfair Dismissal News

www.workrep.co.uk


  Unfair Dismissal Factsheet   Home
Where there was no prejudice to the claimant, the employment tribunal could substitute its reason for the dismissal which was different to that pleaded in the ET3
Screene v Seatwave Ltd (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2605
7/12/11
Even in a redundancy situation vacancies must be considered throughout the consultation period
King v Royal Bank Of Canada Europe Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0333_10_1810
6/12/11
Employer's justice - the worker had his hours cut and suffered racial discrimination yet the Court of Appeal finds his dismissal 'equitable' and 'fair'
Orr v Milton Keynes Council [2011] EWCA Civ 62
22/02/11
Where there is no unfair dismissal or otherwise termination of employment the tribunal may not consider breach of contract claims
Southern Cross Healthcare Co Ltd v Perkins & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1442
07/01/11
The maximum compensatory award for unfair dismissal increases to £68,400 from the present amount of £65,300 on 1st February 2011, with the maximum for a week's pay increasing from £380 to £400. The basic plus compensatory award will therefore together amount to a maximum of £80,400.
16/12/10
Being incorrectly summarily dismissed for misconduct was not unfair but wrongful dismissal
Weston Recovery Services v Fisher [2010] UKEAT 0062_10_0710
23/11/10

The government appears to be intending to increase the qualifying period for unfair dismissal from one year to two years.
The introduction of this will be relatively simple (effected by an Order under s209 ERA 1996). Workers will to some extent be protected by discrimination law enacted following EU Directives and where no qualifying period is required . Areas such as health & safety. whistleblowing, maternity and trade union related dismissals will continue to be protected. Increasing the threshold to two years could incur difficulties under the1999 House of Lords decision in R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith that held that as women found that as it was a statistical fact that women were less likely than men to reach the two year threshold, the qualifying period was potentially discriminatory (but potentially justifiable for reasons of social policy such as the opening of opportunities in the labour market. This allowed the continuation of the two year qualifying period ).
1/11/10
The effective date of termination is not necessarily when a letter is received, but when it can reasonably be expected to have been read
Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41
14/10/10
For unfair dismissal length of service purposes, working under a different contract did not break continuity of employment
Hussain v Acorn Independent College Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0199_10_0809
05/10/10
An employer's allegations must be spelled out. Euphemistic speech is not acceptable when disciplining or dismissing workers.
Celebi v Scolarest Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0032_10_2807
24/09/10
Where an employer is contemplating disciplinary action the thoroughness of the investigation needs to reflect the potential consequences to the worker
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522
30/05/10
Unofficial industrial action can justify a fair conduct dismissal (not protected by EU and Human Rights law)
SANDHU v GATE GOURMET LONDON LTD - UKEAT /0264/08/RN
17/07/09
An employment tribunal needs to first identify loss suffered by the employee at the time of dismissal before estimating compensation
Saunders v OCS Group Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0051_09_2805     
02/07/209
Redundancy was a sham, a response to protected disclosures
El-Megrisi v Azad University - UKEAT - [2009]
27/06/09
When deciding compensation the ET was entitled to speculate on the future losses of the claimant.
Islam Channel Ltd v Ridley [2009] UKEAT - [2009]
26/06/09
Post decision vexatious behaviour lost the claimant his compensation
Aryeetey v Tuntum Housing Association [2009] EAT
18/06/09
Constructive unfair dismissal claim valid even where only some of the claimant's complaints in grievance
Parsons v Burworth Estates - EAT 2009
29/05/2009
The Court of Appeal's unreasonable affinity for the 'Range of Reasonable Responses' -
London Ambulance v Small - CA [2009]
04/05/2009
Absence of dismissal warning in Step 1 email was automatically unfair - Zimmer v Brezan 29/03/2009
Tribunals should “give reasons which are candid, intelligible, transparent and coherent” CLARK v CLARK CONSTRUCTION 06/01/2009
Employment tribunals may award compensation only for damages resulting from an unfair dismissal, not an employer's prior conduct Robins Ltd v Triggs [2008] EWCA Civ 17 01/05/08
Re-Engagement Orders should specify into which job the Claimant will be re-engaged
Home Office v Khan & King - EAT 2008 The ruling in this case can be read  Here
14/2/08

Expired disciplinary warnings may sometimes be used in decisions of whether to dismiss an employee who commit further disciplinary infractions, but this should be the exception rather than the rule - Airbus V Webb - CA 2008
The CA decision may be read  Here
9/02/2008
The implied term of mutual trust and confidence 8/12/2007
Sleight Of Hand Given Thumbs Down By Employment Appeals Tribunal ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND v BEVAN 6/12/2007
Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) Removes Employee Contract Illegality Bar In Unfair Dismissal Cases 26/07/07
No Recourse To Mangold For Over 65's Unfairly Dismissed Before October 1 2006 15/07/07
When Is A Resignation Not A Resignation? 15/06/07
Double Recovery in Unfair Dismissal allowed - Norton Tool confirmed
Burlo v Langley and Carter [2006] EWCA Civ 1778
23/12/2006
Decison In EAT Could Adversely Affect Future ET Claims
Levenes solicitors v Dalley
11/12/06
Polkey Reversal Setback For Workers
Kelly-Madden v Manor Surgery
27/11/06

Unfair Dismissal and employment termination:

An employer terminating an worker's employment without warning, without going through the procedures and possibly for different reasons to those stated to the employee (unfair reasons) such as found with unfair selection for dismissal can all lead to a tribunal case for unfair dismissal. Termination of employment without going through an agreed company procedure is contrary to the new Acas Discipline and Grievance Code of Practice and will invite a finding by the tribunal of unfair dismissal.

A worker might also have enough of stressful conditions of work, of favouritism in the workplace or of discrimination or even sexual harassment or victimisation. Discrimination victimisation and harassment can come in different forms and if the employee feels he needs to leave his place of work without giving notice then he will often try and claim unfair constructive dismissal.

Although there is no statutory definition of the term unfair dismissal an employment tribunal will refer to the substantial caselaw that has grown up around unfair dismissal from the Employment Appeals Tribunal all the way through the Court of Appeal to the House of Lords.

There are a number of reasons an employer can use to terminate work legally:

Redundancy:- lack of work in the company is a justification for redundancy. It is a valid reason for dismissal but redundancy must meet certain criteria and failure by an employer to follow the correct legal procedure could lead to unfair dismissal or even discrimination claims. For example using LIFO (last in first out)as a selection criteria for redundancy nowadays is putting an employer on potentially dangerous ground as this can be seen as being discriminatory on the grounds of age.

If work available has diminished and there is be no other suitable alternative work available (a company must show it has tried to find alternative employment within the company) or the company closes down redundancy can be justified.

Capability:- if the employee does not to perform his job to a satisfactory standard then he can be dismissed and there are a number or reasons an employer can cite as justification on the grounds of in capability such as lack of skills, lack of knowledge, being generally incompetent or for any other substantive reason.

Gross misconduct or unacceptable behaviour:- many illegal (unlawful) or anti-social acts are covered such as: corruption or using computers to download pornography, or to conduct private business (see your contract - even reading your private emails may become a sackable offence if a clause of your contract covers this)abuse, repeated lateness, theft or drunkenness, proven misuse of sickness absences or even scruffiness in appearance or refusal to wear company dress.

Breaking the law:- An employer must not be breaking the law by employing a worker. When not legally entitled to work such as when a work permit has expired a worker may be legally dismissed.

Any other substantial:- reason is also a basis for legal justification to dismiss an employee, and an employment tribunal will consider each case on its merits.

If you have been dismissed without good reason an Employment Tribunal can order compensation or re-instatement.

Always keep in mind that you have 3 months to make a claim at employment tribunal for unfair dismissal.



© Workrep 2009 All rights reserved