Procedure News

www.workrep.co.uk

---

	Home
Time limits may be extended following wrong information from an employer (but not an adviser) Northamptonshire County Council v Entwhistle [2010] UKEAT/0540/09/ZT	29/06/10
Litigation privilege applies to advice from consultants and lawyers from the time litigation becomes an issue Scotthorne v. Four Seasons Conservatories (UK) Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0178_10_1405	25/06/10
The disclosing of without prejudice communications Woodward v Santander [2010] UKEAT/0250/09/ZT	26/05/10
Criterion for awarding uplifts under the Dispute Resolution Procedures Lawless v Print Plus [2010] UKEAT/0333/09/JOJ	25/05/10
When deciding whether to allow an amendment the lateness of the application is only one factor to be taken into account by the employment judge Baker v The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis [2010] UKEAT 0201_09_0502	10/02/10
A discrimination case may not proceed on the mere possibility that evidence might emerge during cross examination ABN Amro Management Services v Hogben [2009] UKEAT 0266_09_0111	29/11/09
Review of sanctions application: the judge does not have to expressly consider each factor set out in CPR 3.9 St Albans Girls School & Anor v Neary [2009] EWCA Civ 1190	19/11/09
'Subcontractors' were employees - perversity appeals and the judge's notes Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 1046	14/10/09
Contract was ultra vires but employee still able to pursue unfair dismissal claim under ERA 96 Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital NHS Trust v Lairikyengbam [2009] UKEAT 0499_08_2108	22/08/09
Equal Pay - New Comparators constitute the addition of a new cause of action; they vary (not terminate) Contracts   -   Potter v N.Cumbria NHS TRUST	02/06/2009
Employment tribunals will first consider whether the case is in time. Farr v Ryefell Ltd - EAT - [2009]	20/04/09
Starting off on the wrong foot - the little details are important    -   Chowles v West	30/03/2009
The tribunal must not elaborate when answering questions put by the EAT (Burns-Barke procedure) - WOODHOUSE SCHOOL v WEBSTER - [2009] EWCA Civ 91	01/03/2009
Tribunals should “give reasons which are candid, intelligible, transparent and coherent” CLARK v CLARK CONSTRUCTION - 2008	06/01/2009
Internal Appeal Ending On Last Day Did Not Prevent 3 Month Extension Ashcroft v Haberdashers - EAT 2008	10/01/08
Sleight Of Hand Given Thumbs Down By Employment Appeals Tribunal ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND v BEVAN	6/12/2007
Disclaimer : articles and information published by WorkRep.co.uk are intended for general information purposes only. No representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy or reliability of such information are made. © 2009 Workrep. All rights reserved

Your web browser doesn't support frames