UCU union sponsors trip to the UK of antisemite condemned by SAHRC for 'hate speech'

www.workrep.co.uk

    Helping You     About     Links     Contact     Site Info     HOME

16/12/2009


Last year UCU (University and College Union) drew criticism over allegations of its being 'institutionally antisemitic'. This followed complaints from jewish members of UCU of harassment and bullying, for the publishing of antisemitic comments on UCU's website 'activists list' and for the failure of UCU to address jewish members' and the British Jewish Community's concerns regarding antisemitism within the union.

Many jewish members have left UCU owing to the atmosphere of intolerance within the union (see Julius letter below).

The UCU union was further criticised for its adopting a motion advocating a boycott of Israel and its academia. This move is seen by many as antisemitic in that a boycott has never previously been aimed at institutions of learning or academics elsewhere. That only jews will be subject to such draconian measures has been compared with the boycotts instituted by the nazis before the implementation of the Holocaust. Jewish businesses were boycotted and professionals were deprived of their living.

UCU has now sponsored the visit of a Mr Mongani Masuku whose purpose in visiting Britain is to further the campaign for a boycott and to argue on British campuses that Israel is an 'apartheid' state. Mr Masuku was only last month condemned by the South African Human Rights Commission (concerned with racism in South Africa) for his statements that amounted to antisemitic 'hate speech'.

Amongst other utterances Mr Masuku has stated that Jews who are not anti-Zionist are "agents of apartheid and friends of Hitler".

Mr Masuku might be interested in what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had to say on this subject:-

"And what is anti-Zionist? It is the denial to the Jewish people of a fundamental right that we justly claim for the people of Africa and freely accord all other nations of the Globe. It is discrimination against Jews, my friend, because they are Jews. In short, it is antisemitism."
"The antisemite rejoices at any opportunity to vent his malice. The times have made it unpopular, in the West, to proclaim openly a hatred of the Jews. This being the case, the antisemite must constantly seek new forms and forums for his poison. How he must revel in the new masquerade! He does not hate the Jews, he is just 'anti-Zionist'!"

UCU needs to ask itself whether its reputation is enhanced through sponsoring the tour around British universities of an antisemite condemned by the respected South African Human Rights Commission.

The UCU should now condemn Mr Bongani Masuku and dissociate itself from him. COSATU of which Masuku is its International Relations Secretary,should do likewise.

Anything short of dissociation and condemnation of Mr Masuku by the UCU union will serve as a further indication of the institutional nature of antisemitism within the union.

From the SAHRC Ruling:

  • "Mr Masuku uttered numerous anti-semitic remarks which were seen to have incited violence and hatred amongst the students who were present."
  • " This finding is based on the statements and comments made by Mr Masuku"
  • " 28. In light of the above, the Commission hereby finds that the statements made by Mr. Bongani Masuku amounts to hate speech. "


  • The analysis of antisemitism by Steve Cohen (a non-zionist who was highly critical of Israel) is worth reading, not least by UCU members and officials.

     
      That's Funny You Don't Look Anti-Semitic - An anti-racist analysis of left anti-semitism by Steve Cohen  

    A letter by Anthony Julius to UCU:-   This letter followed claims of institutional antisemitism by the UCU union, of bullying and harrassment of its jewish members

    Findings of SAHRC:-   Condemnation of Mr Masuku for 'hate speech'

    A sociologist's (David Hirsch)   analysis of contemporary anti-zionism

    Anthony Julius   gives a fascinating tour of the roots of anti-semitism from its beginnings in the New Testament through to modern anti-zionsim

    The Livingstone Formulation   for legitimising anti-semitism


    Some recent employment cases:-
    2009
    A philosophical belief based on science is protected by the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 - Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2009] UKEAT/0219/09/ZT
    Christian counsellor who would not help same sex couples was not discriminated against - McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0106_09_3011
    Under TUPE the obligation to inform always applies, even when no measures are contemplated relating to the transfer - Cable Realisations Ltd v GMB Northern [2009] UKEAT
    The Court of Appeal rules on Harassment and 'Oppressive and Unacceptable' behaviour
    Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1288 For s4A(3) of the DDA to apply the employer must have known (or ought to have known) that the employee was disabled and that the disability would affect him in the manner described in section 4A(1) - DWP v Alam [2009] UKEAT 0242_09_0911
    A discrimination case may not proceed on the mere possibility that evidence might emerge during cross examination - ABN Amro Management Services v Hogben [2009] UKEAT 0266_09_0111
    In cases of discriminatory dismissal tribunals may reduce compensation if the worker would in any event have been dismissed - Chagger v Abbey National Plc & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1202
    In cases of discriminatory dismissal tribunals may reduce compensation if the worker would in any event have been dismissed - Chagger v Abbey National Plc & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1202
    It is possible to claim unfair dismissal abroad even if the workplace is registered outside the UK - Diggins v Condor Marine Crewing Services Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1133
    Autoklenz 'Subcontractors' were employees - the contractual substitution clause was just 'window dressing' - Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 1046
    Contract was ultra vires but employee still able to pursue unfair dimsissal claim under ERA 96 - Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital NHS Trust v Lairikyengbam [2009] UKEAT 0499_08_2108
    Redundancies - ECJ rules that consultations do not need to begin until the parent company decides which subsidiary will be affected - Akavan Erityisalojen Keskusliitto AEK ry and Others v Fujitsu Siemens Computers Oy - ECJ [2009] Case C-44/08
    ECJ rules holiday entitlement must not be lost through illness - Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA - ECJ [2009] C-277/08


    Do you have a problem at work? Are you being discriminated against harassed or victimised at work or have you been unfairly dismissed or wrongfully dismissed? If you are suffering from bullying victimisation or discrimination at work you need to contact WorkRep early on. Whatever your employment problem is, even if you have failed in your tribunal case and there is now a costs application against you we will try to help. click for further information about problems at work

    Disclaimer: articles and information published by WorkRep.co.uk are for general information purposes only.  Please read the site info before using this website  © 2009 Workrep