An employee who holds confidential information about a competitor that he hopes to work for does not need to inform his existing employer

To do so would mean being in breach of confidence to the new employer

Customer Systems Plc v Ranson & Ors [2011] EWHC 3304 (QB)

    Helping You     About     Links     Contact     Site Info     HOME

26/01/2011

An employee with confidential information about a competitor he wishes to work for does not need to inform his existing employer as this involve a breach of confidence to the new employer.

An employee is normally not under a duty to disclose confidential information belonging to a potential new employer even when a direct competitor of the existing employer. The duty of fidelity an employee owes the employer means that he must serve the employer with good faith and fidelity. Whilst employed he must not compete with his own employer.

Where a fiduciary duty to the employer arises such as with directors of companies the worker must act only in the interests of the employer. In this case the High Court considered whether employees who had competed with their employer a niche computer service provider dealing mostly with database systems such as Oracle before their employment ended, were in breach of their contracts and duties of fidelity and fiduciary duties.

In the High Court's finding it decided that a senior sales manager did owe a fiduciary duty as well as a duty of fidelity. He was privy to details of inner workings of the business and in his position of responsibility had knowledge of business information that even the owner did not know about.

The manager was not however obliged to advise his employer about confidential matters regarding competition from a potential new employer (his own company 'Praesto')as this would have meant him being in breach of confidence to the new 'employer' (himself). The breach of fiduciary duty and duty of fidelity were however cause by helping the competitor to get new business even though he was still working for the old employer to whom he had a fiduciary duty.

Although there was no obligation for him to advise his employer about his setting up in business for himself he was not allowed to copy and use his employer's templates and documents.

Inducing another worker to work for him was not subject to an enforceable covenant but if there had existed then he would have been in breach. And if a worker had breached his contract in working for the new employer then he would become liable for inducing a breach of contract.

There was no breach of a post termination restriction.

Implied duties and post termination restrictions are case specific. They depend largely on the express terms in the employment contract. Restrictive covenants that determine obligations of an employee even after termination need to be carefully scrutinised by an employee wishing to set out on his own.

Transcript of the judgement:-   Customer Systems Plc v Ranson & Ors [2011] EWHC 3304 (QB)
WorkRep.co.uk
Protecting Workers


Some recent employment cases:-
2011
There is no single definition regarding domestic workers treated as family members and thus exempt from the National Minimum Wage. - Chamsi-Pasha v Udin [2011] UKEAT 0070_11_0812 & Julio & ors v Jose [2011] UKEAT
Equality Act 2010 claimants (formerly claiming under Equal Pay Act 1970 and Sex Discrimination Act) can choose to bring claims in court or the employment tribunal. - Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1412
Where there was no prejudice to the claimant, the employment tribunal could substitute its reason for the dismissal which was different to that pleaded in the ET3 - Screene v Seatwave Ltd (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2605
Even in a redundancy situation vacancies must be considered throughout the consultation period - King v Royal Bank Of Canada Europe Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0333_10_1810
Refusing to increase a protected payment was not an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to the Employment Rights Act ( ERA ) 1996 - Barts and the London NHS Trust v Verma [2011] EWCA Civ 1129
A new offer of employment must for the purposes of mitigation and compensation be considered seriously by a claimant. - Debique v Ministry Of Defence [2011] UKEAT 0075_11_1509
Pre-trial publicity may affect the possibility of costs being awarded against a claimant in the EAT. - Iteshi v Office of Water Services (Ofwat) [2011] UKEAT 0178_11_2209
Having a corporate financial interest in the outcome or being a governor of a body equates with apparent bias in ones own case - Kaur, R (on the application of) v Institute of Legal Executives Appeal Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1168
The CJEU Advocate General advises that Part-time Judges are workers and that discrimination against different types of judges is not allowed. - O'Brien v Ministry of Justice [2010] UKSC 34
Costs are compensatory not punitive and reflect the "effect" of the conduct in question" - Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva [2011] EWCA Civ 1255
Unheard and contested matters dismissed at a pre-hearing should not be the subject of a costs award - Dean & Dean (a firm) & Ors v Dionissiou -Moussaoui (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 1332
Ogden Tables may be acceptable to determine pension loss where cogent reasons are given - Chief Constable Of West Midlands Police v Gardner [2011] UKEAT 0174_11_1910
A holiday must be taken within a reasonable time period or the holiday will cease to be considered as providing a rest from work, but rather "a period of relaxation and leisure" - KHS AG v Schulte ECJ Case C-214/10
The emasculation of the employment tribunal system is the next stage on the road to a fundamental undermining of workers' rights and protections in Britain
The level of compensatory award for unfair dismissal must be 'grossed up' before the application of the statutory cap. - Hardie Grant London Ltd v Aspden [2011] UKEAT 0242_11_0311
Even where lists of issues have been agreed between the parties they should be scrutinised by employment judges. - Price v Surrey County Council & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0450_10_2710
Female workers suffered indirect sex discrimination in a pension scheme but no loss (and therefore will not receive compensation) - Copple & Ors v Littlewoods Plc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1281
In order to claim holiday pay under Reg 16 (1) of the Working Time Regulations an employee must have already have stated an intention to take it. - Fraser v Southwest London St George’s Mental Health Trust [2011] UKEAT 0456_10_0311
Even where lists of issues have been agreed between the parties they should be scrutinised by employment judges. - Price v Surrey County Council & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0450_10_2710
Claimants with Before the Event Insurance may choose their own solicitor - Brown-Quinn & Anor v Equity Syndicate Managment LTD & Anor [2011] EWHC 2661
The High Court issues guidance as to when contractual provisions are valid - Hussain v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 1670 (QB)
Disciplinary processes must be conducted fairly and without undue delay - Lim v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 2178 (QB)
An employer's reasonable (but wrong) belief that a worker is working illegally is no defence to an illegal deduction from wages claim - Okuoimose v City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0192_11_1309
Whistleblowers are not protected against victimisation by fellow workers - NHS Manchester v Fecitt & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1190
An employee sharing profits in the firm is not necessarily a partner - Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars EAT [2011] UKEAT/2011/0065_10_2705
Leaving a page out of the reasons for an EAT appeal was venial - Hine & Anor (t/a Hine Marketing Partnership) v Talbot & Ors [2011] UKEAT 1783_10_2706
In Equal Pay claims after a TUPE transfer, red circling will be accepted as constituting a genuine material factor defence - Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan & Anor (Equal Pay Act : Material factor defence and justification) [2011] UKEAT 0042_10_2505
If you have a problem at work over harassment, disability, sex, age, race discrimination or bullying or are seeking compensation or reinstatement for unfair or constructive dismissal then contact workrep for an evaluation of your case. We can also advise you on equal pay, TUPE or employment status. Often an employee will come to us over a breach of contract by their employer or for issues concerning whistleblowing. If your employer has made you redundant you might in fact have been unfairly dismissed or wrongfully dismissed. If you have any other employment issues don't hesitate to contact WorkRep.
You do not need to accept being discriminated against harassed or victimised at work. If you are suffering from bullying victimisation or discrimination at work you need to contact WorkRep early on. Whatever your employment problem is, even if you have failed in your tribunal case and there is now a costs application against you we will try to help. click for further information about problems at work

Disclaimer: articles and information published by WorkRep.co.uk are for general information purposes only.  Please read the site info before using this website