EU Agency Directive 2008 finally implemented by Britain as the Agency Worker Regulations 2010This is a major step forwards in protecting agency workers | |||
Helping You About Links Contact Site Info HOME | |||
|
10/10/2011 The EU DIRECTIVE 2008/104/EC as translated by the UK Government in consultation with the trades unions and the CBI into the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 has finally come into force shortly before the EU deadline of 5th December 2011. As with previous EU directives Britain implemented this Directive on improving agency workers rights on October 1st2011 near enough to the last moment in as weak a form as allowed by the Directive. Thus for example agency workers will not be allowed to claim unfair dismissal, and allowance is made for the ability to opt out of the equality provisions. There is no denying however that these Regulations are another and major step forward for agency workers, and yet again thanks to the European Union. Workers rights in the UK would be a lot more 'flexible' i.e. poorer if not for european protections forced on this country. Britain whether during the period of the Labour party or of the Conservative/Liberal-Conservative coalition has always attempted to play the role of spoiler when it comes to european inspired attempts to improve workers' rights. The Agency Workers Directive is an example of this. Britain and Germany managed to frustrate the implementation of the Directive for six years until Britain in 2008 obtained concessions on the WTR in exchange for ceasing its attempts to frustrate the AWD from being adopted. Now that the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 are in force since October 1st 2011 agency workers are entitled to the same basic employment and working conditions as other workers in the company. Rights that will not be conferred on agency workers include the right to claim unfair dismissal, minimum notice or redundancy pay. Already entitled to:
agency workers will from the time they start working for a company be entitled to have:
Employers will of course find themselves tempted to attempt to wriggle out of their duties under the Agency Regulations such as by terminating agency workers in the eleventh week. They will however have to wait six weeks before re-employing any so terminated worker. And if the employer is later judged by an employment tribunal to be a serial offender in sacking his agency workers after 11 weeks, then he might find he ends up paying the affected workers up to £5,000 each. Employers will of course attempt other ways of avoiding their duties such as using 'self-employed sub-contracters', casual or zero hour workers with contracts containing no minimum hours. This should be the next loophole in labour law that the EU addresses as british political parties including the part union funded 'Labour' party are unlikely to ever find the will to do so. |
|||
| Click for transcript of:- Agency Worker Regulations 2010 Click for transcript of:- EU DIRECTIVE 2008/104/EC |
|
||
| 2011 EU Agency Directive 2008 finally implemented by Britain as the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 George Osbourne for the Liberal-Conservative Government moves to limit workers' access to justice - When deciding the level of costs to be paid, if a tribunal exercises the discretion to take means into account, all the means must be assessed - SHIELDS AUTOMOTIVE LTD v GREIG [2011] UKEAT 0024_10_1507 It was not unfair or inequitable not to re-hire under conditions offered in failed negotiations - Slade & Others v TNT (UK) Ltd (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0113_11_1309 An employee sharing profits in the firm is not necessarily a partner - Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars EAT [2011] UKEAT/2011/0065_10_2705 Leaving a page out of the reasons for an EAT appeal was venial - Hine & Anor (t/a Hine Marketing Partnership) v Talbot & Ors [2011] UKEAT 1783_10_2706 In Equal Pay claims after a TUPE transfer, red circling will be accepted as constituting a genuine material factor defence - Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan & Anor (Equal Pay Act : Material factor defence and justification) [2011] UKEAT 0042_10_2505 The Minimum wage did not apply to a worker sleeping over without duties to perform - Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd (National Minimum Wage [2011] UKEAT 0102_11_1407 Requests to continue working after 65 must be considered in good faith - Compass Group Plc v Ayodele [2011] UKEAT 0484_10_1407 An autocratic style of management is no justification for breaching the contractual term of trust and confidence - McBride v Falkirk Football & Athletic Club [2011] UKEAT 0058_10_1706 Overtime payments in the absence of an agreement - Driver v Air India Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 830 Mere suspicion that a representative was acting for profit was not enough for imposing wasted costs - Jackson v Cambridgeshire County Council & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0402_09_0806 |
|||
| If you have a problem at work over harassment, disability, sex, age, race discrimination or bullying or are seeking compensation or reinstatement for unfair or constructive dismissal then contact workrep for an evaluation of your case. We can also advise you on equal pay, TUPE or employment status. Often an employee will come to us over a breach of contract by their employer or for issues concerning whistleblowing. If your employer has made you redundant you might in fact have been unfairly dismissed or wrongfully dismissed. If you have any other employment issues don't hesitate to contact WorkRep. You do not need to accept being discriminated against harassed or victimised at work. If you are suffering from bullying victimisation or discrimination at work you need to contact WorkRep early on. Whatever your employment problem is, even if you have failed in your tribunal case and there is now a costs application against you we will try to help. click for further information about problems at work |
|||
|
© 2011 Workrep | |||